What's happening
This bill expands protections against excess hospital charges for emergency services, including dispute resolution rights and procedures for non-participating hospitals.
Why it matters
Expands patient protections to include emergency services from non-participating hospitals, not just physicians. this means more patients are covered against surprise or excessive bills when they require urgent care at out-of-network hospitals, especially after an emergency room visit.
Establishes a clear, binding dispute resolution process for hospital charges. both hospitals and insurers can submit billing disputes to an independent reviewer, who must decide within 30 days, aiming to resolve billing disagreements more fairly and efficiently.
Limits out-of-pocket costs for insured patients to what they would pay at in-network facilities. this reduces the risk of financial hardship for patients needing emergency care, ensuring they are not penalized for circumstances beyond their control.
Exempts safety net hospitals (where 60%+ of discharges are Medicaid, uninsured, or dual eligible patients) from these requirements. this provision recognizes the financial vulnerability of these hospitals and attempts to balance patient protections with the sustainability of essential community providers.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Limit Hospital ER Charges
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
20 Co-sponsors
History
- Substituted by A264B
- Ordered to third reading cal.1598
- Committee discharged and committed to rules
- Print number 3171a
- Amend (t) and recommit to insurance
- Referred to insurance
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Limit Emergency Hospital Charges
Signed by Governor · Sponsor Kevin Cahill
Full text
3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
3171--A
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
February 4, 2019
Introduced by Sens. KRUEGER, SEWARD, THOMAS, AMEDORE, BOYLE, GOUNARDES, HARCKHAM, LIU, MARTINEZ, SALAZAR, SEPULVEDA, SKOUFIS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Insurance -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the financial services law, in relation to establishing protections from excess hospital charges
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Section 605 of the financial services law, as added by section 26 of part H of chapter 60 of the laws of 2014, is amended to read as follows:
§ 605. Dispute resolution for emergency services. (a) Emergency services for an insured. (1) When a health care plan receives a bill for emergency services from a non-participating physician or hospital, including a bill for inpatient services which follow an emergency room visit, the health care plan shall pay an amount that it determines is reasonable for the emergency services rendered by the non-participating physician or hospital, in accordance with section three thousand two hundred twenty-four-a of the insurance law, except for the insured's co-payment, coinsurance or deductible, if any, and shall ensure that the insured shall incur no greater out-of-pocket costs for the emergency services than the insured would have incurred with a participating physician or hospital pursuant to subsection (c) of section three thousand two hundred forty-one of the insurance law.
(2) A non-participating physician or hospital or a health care plan may submit a dispute regarding a fee or payment for emergency services for review to an independent dispute resolution entity. In cases where a health care plan submits a dispute regarding a fee for payment of a non-participating hospital's emergency services, the health care plan
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD03101-04-9
S. 3171--A 2
shall, after the initial payment, pay any additional amounts it determines is reasonable directly to the non-participating hospital.
(3) The independent dispute resolution entity shall make a determination within thirty days of receipt of the dispute for review.
(4) In determining a reasonable fee for the services rendered, an independent dispute resolution entity shall select either the health care plan's payment or the non-participating physician's or hospital's fee. The independent dispute resolution entity shall determine which amount to select based upon the conditions and factors set forth in section six hundred four of this article. If an independent dispute resolution entity determines, based on the health care plan's payment and the non-participating physician's or hospital's fee, that a settlement between the health care plan and non-participating physician or hospital is reasonably likely, or that both the health care plan's payment and the non-participating physician's or hospital's fee represent unreasonable extremes, then the independent dispute resolution entity may direct both parties to attempt a good faith negotiation for settlement. The health care plan and non-participating physician or hospital may be granted up to ten business days for this negotiation, which shall run concurrently with the thirty day period for dispute resolution.
(b) Emergency services for a patient that is not an insured. (1) A patient that is not an insured or the patient's physician may submit a dispute regarding a fee for emergency services for review to an independent dispute resolution entity upon approval of the superintendent.
(2) An independent dispute resolution entity shall determine a reasonable fee for the services based upon the same conditions and factors set forth in section six hundred four of this article.
(3) A patient that is not an insured shall not be required to pay the physician's or hospital's fee in order to be eligible to submit the dispute for review to an independent dispute resolution entity.
(c) The determination of an independent dispute resolution entity shall be binding on the health care plan, physician or hospital and patient, and shall be admissible in any court proceeding between the health care plan, physician or hospital or patient, or in any administrative proceeding between this state and the physician or hospital.
(d) The provisions of this section shall not apply to hospitals that had at least sixty percent of inpatient discharges annually which consisted of medicaid, uninsured, and dual eligible individuals as determined by the department of health in its determination of safety net hospitals.
§ 2. Subsection (a) of section 608 of the financial services law, as added by section 26 of part H of chapter 60 of the laws of 2014, is amended to read as follows:
(a) For disputes involving an insured, when the independent dispute resolution entity determines the health care plan's payment is reasonable, payment for the dispute resolution process shall be the responsibility of the non-participating physician or hospital. When the independent dispute resolution entity determines the non-participating physician's or hospital's fee is reasonable, payment for the dispute resolution process shall be the responsibility of the health care plan. When a good faith negotiation directed by the independent dispute resolution entity pursuant to paragraph four of subsection (a) of section six hundred five of this article, or paragraph six of subsection (a) of section six hundred seven of this article results in a settlement between the health care plan and non-participating physician or
S. 3171--A 3
hospital, the health care plan and the non-participating physician or hospital shall evenly divide and share the prorated cost for dispute resolution.
§ 3. Section 604 of the financial services law, as added by section 26 of part H of chapter 60 of the laws of 2014, is amended to read as follows:
§ 604. Criteria for determining a reasonable fee. In determining the appropriate amount to pay for a health care service, an independent dispute resolution entity shall consider all relevant factors, including:
(a) whether there is a gross disparity between the fee charged by the [physician] health care provider for services rendered as compared to:
(1) fees paid to the involved [physician] health care provider for the same services rendered by the [physician] health care provider to other patients in health care plans in which the [physician] health care provider is not participating, and
(2) in the case of a dispute involving a health care plan, fees paid by the health care plan to reimburse similarly qualified [physicians] health care providers for the same services in the same region who are not participating with the health care plan;
(b) the level of training, education and experience of the [physician] health care provider;
(c) the [physician's] health care provider's usual charge for comparable services with regard to patients in health care plans in which the [physician] health care provider is not participating;
(d) the circumstances and complexity of the particular case, including time and place of the service;
(e) individual patient characteristics; and, with regard to physician services,
(f) the usual and customary cost of the service.
§ 4. This act shall take effect immediately.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the financial services law, in relation to establishing protections from excess hospital charges
Purpose
This bill subjects hospital charges for emergency services to the inde- pendent dispute resolution process established to protect against exces- sive emergency charges.
Summary of provisions
Section 1 amends section 605 of the financial services law by including hospital charges, including bills for inpatient services which follow an emergency room visit, in the emergency charges that are subject to the independent dispute resolution process. It provides that if a health insurer submits a dispute regarding the hospital's charge to dispute resolution, the health insurer shall pay a reasonable amount for the services directly to the hospital. It also exempts hospitals that had at least sixty percent of inpatient discharges annually which consisted of medicaid, uninsured and dual eligible individuals as determined by the department of health in its determination of safety net hospitals.
Section 2 amends section 608 of the financial services law by including hospitals in the payment and settlement provisions with respect to the cost of the independent dispute resolution process.
Section 3 amends section 604 of the financial services law by including hospitals in the standard of review with respect to the criteria for determining a reasonable fee.
Section 4 sets the effective date.
Justification
Section 3241 of the insurance law requires health insurers to ensure that enrollees incur no greater out-of-pocket costs than they would have incurred with a participating provider when emergency services are received from a non-participating provider. Currently, section 605 of the financial services law establishes an independent dispute resolution process for physician emergency charges.
The charges billed by hospitals for emergency services when they are out-of-network are often excessive. This is particularly true given section 3241 of the insurance law cited above, which essentially requires health insurers to pay charges to non-participating hospitals for emergency services to ensure that members are not balance billed. Hospitals are assured of receiving their billed charges, notwithstanding how excessive the charges might be.
Hospital charges for emergency services must be subject to dispute resolution to ensure that hospitals are not able to take advantage of section 3241 of the insurance law by charging exorbitant fees which ultimately drive up the cost of health insurance.
Legislative history
2019-2020: S.3171A/A.264A Cahill 2017-2018: S4241C Seward/ A7611 -Cahill - Passed Assembly 06/04/18 amended on third reading 7611c 2015-2016: S.7868 Seward/A.10470 - Passed Assembly
Fiscal implications
None.
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.