Skip to content
A5188Assembly2019-2020 SessionSame asS3495

Cut MTA Tax for East End

Official title

“Relates to the definition of the metropolitan commuter transportation district for the purposes of the metropolitan commuter transportation mobility tax”

Sponsor Fred ThieleAD-1+2 co-sponsorsAffects Finance
Status
In Assembly Committee
Ways And Means
Impact
7/10
Significant
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Ways And Means

What's happening

This bill exempts six Suffolk County towns from the MTA mobility tax and requires MTA to renegotiate service agreements with Connecticut.

Why it matters

  1. Addresses perceived regional tax inequity. By exempting six eastern Suffolk County towns from the MTA mobility tax and mandating reimbursement for previously collected taxes, the bill aims to correct what is seen as an unfair financial burden on areas receiving minimal MTA services, possibly setting a precedent for other regions with similar complaints.

  2. Direct financial impact for local businesses and residents. The exemption and reimbursement could provide significant tax relief—over $60 million annually—freeing up resources for local businesses and taxpayers in these towns, which may stimulate the local economy but could impact MTA revenue.

  3. Alters NY-CT transit cost-sharing and fare policy. By requiring renegotiation of the Metro-North New Haven line agreement, the bill seeks to ensure Connecticut pays a fairer share based on actual usage and fare parity, which could result in higher fares or increased subsidies for Connecticut riders, and potentially lower costs for New York.

  4. Potential for reduced service if negotiations fail. If Connecticut does not agree to new terms, the bill authorizes the MTA to cut services and expenses on the New Haven line, which could disrupt commuter transit options and affect cross-border economic activity.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Cut MTA Tax for East End

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Fred Thiele

Assembly Member · Assembly District 1

History

  1. Referred to ways and means
  2. Referred to ways and means

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

S3495Senate

Exempt Some Towns from MTA Tax

In Senate Committee · Investigations And Government Operations · Sponsor Kenneth P. LaValle

Impact 7 · Significant0% to pass

Full text

2 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

S. 3495 A. 5188

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

SENATE - ASSEMBLY

February 7, 2019

IN SENATE -- Introduced by Sen. LAVALLE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Government Operations

IN ASSEMBLY -- Introduced by M. of A. THIELE, ENGLEBRIGHT, COLTON -read once and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

AN ACT to amend the tax law, in relation to the definition of the metropolitan commuter transportation district for the purposes of the metropolitan commuter transportation mobility tax; and to amend the public authorities law, in relation to requiring the metropolitan transportation authority to renegotiate the joint service operating agreement with the state of Connecticut

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Legislative findings. Pursuant to chapter 25 of the laws of 2009, the legislature did enact the metropolitan mobility tax within the twelve county region constituting the metropolitan transportation district. The legislature hereby finds that the residents of the towns of Brookhaven, East Hampton, Riverhead, Shelter Island, Southold and Southampton in the county of Suffolk receive minimal mass transit services from the metropolitan transportation authority. Further, these towns already pay substantial taxes to the MTA for these minimal services, including increased sales taxes and mortgage recording taxes. It has been estimated these six towns contribute more than $60 million annually to the MTA than they receive back in service.

In the interest of tax fairness and to avoid such additional inequitable taxation on these towns, it is the purpose of this act to exempt such towns from the newly adopted metropolitan commuter transportation mobility tax.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD03168-01-9

S. 3495 2 A. 5188

§ 2. Subsection (a) of section 800 of the tax law, as added by section 1 of part C of chapter 25 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows:

(a) Metropolitan commuter transportation district. The metropolitan commuter transportation district ("MCTD") means the area of the state included in the district created and governed by section twelve hundred sixty-two of the public authorities law, except that for the purposes of this article, the towns of Brookhaven, East Hampton, Riverhead, Shelter Island, Southampton and Southold in Suffolk County shall be excluded from the district for the purposes of this article and any revenues previously collected from within these counties shall be reimbursed to each payor by March thirty-first, two thousand twenty-one.

§ 3. Section 1266 of the public authorities law is amended by adding a new subdivision 19 to read as follows:

19. The authority is required by March thirty-first, two thousand twenty-one to:

(a) renegotiate the joint service agreement between the authority and the state of Connecticut related to the operation of the Metro-North New Haven line to (i) require Connecticut to set New Haven line fare increases at levels necessary to sustain equivalent fare levels between New York state residents riding the Metro-North Commuter Railroad and Connecticut residents riding the Metro-North Commuter Railroad, (ii) require that Connecticut operating deficit subsidy payments shall be based on Connecticut resident utilization of the Metro-North Commuter Railroad and Connecticut resident utilization of the New York city transit authority with such subsidies to be determined by multiplying the Connecticut resident utilization percentages for the Metro-North Commuter Railroad and the New York city transit authority by the respective baseline operating deficit of these operating entities prior to subsidy adjustments and prior to increased revenues provided to the authority by New York state residents pursuant to payments mandated by chapter twenty-five of the laws of two thousand nine, and (iii) provide for retroactive lump sum payments due from the state of Connecticut related to calendar year two thousand nine; or

(b) reduce services and expenses related to the Metro-North New Haven line operation by an amount which produces recurring savings to the authority which are equivalent to the increased joint service agreement payments which would be determined under paragraph (a) of this subdivision.

§ 4. This act shall take effect immediately.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.