Skip to content
S1623Senate2019-2020 SessionSame asA2500

Limit Solitary, Add Rehab

Official title

“Restricts the use of segregated confinement and creates alternative therapeutic and rehabilitative confinement options”

Status
In Senate Committee
Crime Victims, Crime And Correction
Impact
8/10
Significant
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Crime Victims, Crime And Correction

What's happening

This bill restricts the use of segregated confinement in New York prisons, establishes new limits and standards, and creates alternative therapeutic and rehabilitative confinement options for certain incarcerated populations.

Why it matters

  1. Redefines and severely limits "segregated confinement". The bill broadens the definition of segregated confinement (solitary) and sets strict upper limits—no one can be held more than 15 consecutive days or 20 days in a 60-day period—aligning New York with international human rights standards like the UN Mandela Rules.

  2. Bans segregated confinement for vulnerable populations. People under 22, over 55, pregnant or postpartum, those with disabilities, and others in "special populations" are fully excluded from segregated confinement, ensuring that the most at-risk groups are protected from the psychological harms of isolation.

  3. Mandates therapeutic alternatives and individualized care. Instead of extended solitary, the bill requires the use of "residential rehabilitation units" focused on therapy, trauma-informed care, and rehabilitation, with individualized plans and regular reviews—aiming to address root causes of behavior and reduce recidivism.

  4. Establishes oversight, transparency, and staff training. The bill mandates detailed public reporting on confinement practices, requires independent reviews for extended placements, and sets comprehensive training requirements for staff—addressing concerns about accountability, data transparency, and the humane treatment of incarcerated people.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Limit Solitary, Add Rehab

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

History

  1. Referred to crime victims, crime and correction
  2. Committed to rules
  3. Advanced to third reading
  4. 2nd report cal.
  5. 1st report cal.24
  6. Referred to crime victims, crime and correction

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A2500Assembly

Limit Solitary, Offer Therapy

In Assembly Committee · Ways And Means · Sponsor Jeffrion Aubry

Impact 8 · Significant0% to pass

Full text

12 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

1623

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

January 15, 2019

Introduced by Sen. SEPULVEDA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Crime Victims, Crime and Correction

AN ACT to amend the correction law, in relation to restricting the use of segregated confinement and creating alternative therapeutic and rehabilitative confinement options

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Subdivision 23 of section 2 of the correction law, as added by chapter 1 of the laws of 2008, is amended to read as follows:

23. "Segregated confinement" means the [disciplinary] confinement of an inmate in [a special housing unit or in a separate keeplock housing unit. Special housing units and separate keeplock units are housing units that consist of cells grouped so as to provide separation from the general population, and may be used to house inmates confined pursuant to the disciplinary procedures described in regulations] any form of cell confinement for more than seventeen hours a day other than in a facility-wide emergency or for the purpose of providing medical or mental health treatment. Cell confinement that is implemented due to medical or mental health treatment shall be within a clinical area in the correctional facility or in as close proximity to a medical or mental health unit as possible.

§ 2. Section 2 of the correction law is amended by adding two new subdivisions 32 and 33 to read as follows:

32. "Special populations" means any person: (a) twenty-one years of age or younger; (b) fifty-five years of age or older; (c) with a disability as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision twenty-one of section two hundred ninety-two of the executive law; or (d) who is pregnant, in the first eight weeks of the post-partum recovery period after giving birth, or caring for a child in a correctional institution pursuant to subdivisions two or three of section six hundred eleven of this chapter.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD05325-01-9

S. 1623 2

33. "Residential rehabilitation unit" means a separate housing unit used for therapy, treatment, and rehabilitative programming of incarcerated people who have been determined to require more than fifteen days of segregated confinement pursuant to department proceedings. Such units shall be therapeutic and trauma-informed, and aim to address individual treatment and rehabilitation needs and underlying causes of problematic behaviors.

§ 3. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 6 of section 137 of the correction law, as amended by chapter 490 of the laws of 1974, is amended to read as follows:

(a) The inmate shall be supplied with a sufficient quantity of wholesome and nutritious food[, provided, however, that such food need not be the same as the food supplied to inmates who are participating in programs of the facility];

§ 4. Paragraph (d) of subdivision 6 of section 137 of the correction law, as added by chapter 1 of the laws of 2008, is amended to read as follows:

(d) (i) Except as set forth in clause (E) of subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph, the department, in consultation with mental health clinicians, shall divert or remove inmates with serious mental illness, as defined in paragraph (e) of this subdivision, from segregated confinement or confinement in a residential rehabilitation unit, where such confinement could potentially be for a period in excess of thirty days, to a residential mental health treatment unit. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to prevent the disciplinary process from proceeding in accordance with department rules and regulations for disciplinary hearings.

(ii) (A) Upon placement of an inmate into segregated confinement or a residential rehabilitation unit at a level one or level two facility, a suicide prevention screening instrument shall be administered by staff from the department or the office of mental health who has been trained for that purpose. If such a screening instrument reveals that the inmate is at risk of suicide, a mental health clinician shall be consulted and appropriate safety precautions shall be taken. Additionally, within one business day of the placement of such an inmate into segregated confinement at a level one or level two facility, the inmate shall be assessed by a mental health clinician.

(B) Upon placement of an inmate into segregated confinement or a residential rehabilitation unit at a level three or level four facility, a suicide prevention screening instrument shall be administered by staff from the department or the office of mental health who has been trained for that purpose. If such a screening instrument reveals that the inmate is at risk of suicide, a mental health clinician shall be consulted and appropriate safety precautions shall be taken. All inmates placed in segregated confinement or a residential rehabilitation unit at a level three or level four facility shall be assessed by a mental health clinician, within [fourteen] seven days of such placement into segregated confinement.

(C) At the initial assessment, if the mental health clinician finds that an inmate suffers from a serious mental illness, that person shall be diverted or removed from segregated confinement or a residential rehabilitation unit and a recommendation shall be made whether exceptional circumstances, as described in clause (E) of this subparagraph, exist. In a facility with a joint case management committee, such recommendation shall be made by such committee. In a facility without a joint case management committee, the recommendation shall be made jointly by a

S. 1623 3

committee consisting of the facility's highest ranking mental health clinician, the deputy superintendent for security, and the deputy superintendent for program services, or their equivalents. Any such recommendation shall be reviewed by the joint central office review committee. The administrative process described in this clause shall be completed within [fourteen] seven days of the initial assessment, and if the result of such process is that the inmate should be removed from segregated confinement or a residential rehabilitation unit, such removal shall occur as soon as practicable, but in no event more than seventytwo hours from the completion of the administrative process. Pursuant to paragraph (g) of this subdivision, nothing in this section shall permit the placement of an incarcerated person with serious mental illness into segregated confinement at any time, even for the purposes of assessment.

(D) If an inmate with a serious mental illness is not diverted or removed to a residential mental health treatment unit, such inmate shall be diverted to a residential rehabilitation unit and reassessed by a mental health clinician within fourteen days of the initial assessment and at least once every fourteen days thereafter. After each such additional assessment, a recommendation as to whether such inmate should be removed from [segregated confinement] a residential rehabilitation unit shall be made and reviewed according to the process set forth in clause (C) of this subparagraph.

(E) A recommendation or determination whether to remove an inmate from segregated confinement or a residential rehabilitation unit shall take into account the assessing mental health clinicians' opinions as to the inmate's mental condition and treatment needs, and shall also take into account any safety and security concerns that would be posed by the inmate's removal, even if additional restrictions were placed on the inmate's access to treatment, property, services or privileges in a residential mental health treatment unit. A recommendation or determination shall direct the inmate's removal from segregated confinement or a residential rehabilitation unit except in the following exceptional circumstances: (1) when the reviewer finds that removal would pose a substantial risk to the safety of the inmate or other persons, or a substantial threat to the security of the facility, even if additional restrictions were placed on the inmate's access to treatment, property, services or privileges in a residential mental health treatment unit; or (2) when the assessing mental health clinician determines that such placement is in the inmate's best interests based on his or her mental condition and that removing such inmate to a residential mental health treatment unit would be detrimental to his or her mental condition. Any determination not to remove an inmate with serious mental illness from segregated confinement or a residential rehabilitation unit shall be documented in writing and include the reasons for the determination.

(iii) Inmates with serious mental illness who are not diverted or removed from [segregated confinement] a residential rehabilitation unit shall be offered a heightened level of mental health care, involving a minimum of [two] three hours [each day, five days a week,] daily of out-of-cell therapeutic treatment and programming. This heightened level of care shall not be offered only in the following circumstances:

(A) The heightened level of care shall not apply when an inmate with serious mental illness does not, in the reasonable judgment of a mental health clinician, require the heightened level of care. Such determination shall be documented with a written statement of the basis of such determination and shall be reviewed by the Central New York Psychiatric Center clinical director or his or her designee. Such a determination is

S. 1623 4

subject to change should the inmate's clinical status change. Such determination shall be reviewed and documented by a mental health clinician every thirty days, and in consultation with the Central New York Psychiatric Center clinical director or his or her designee not less than every ninety days.

(B) The heightened level of care shall not apply in exceptional circumstances when providing such care would create an unacceptable risk to the safety and security of inmates or staff. Such determination shall be documented by security personnel together with the basis of such determination and shall be reviewed by the facility superintendent, in consultation with a mental health clinician, not less than every seven days for as long as the inmate remains in [segregated confinement] a residential rehabilitation unit. The facility shall attempt to resolve such exceptional circumstances so that the heightened level of care may be provided. If such exceptional circumstances remain unresolved for thirty days, the matter shall be referred to the joint central office review committee for review.

(iv) [Inmates with serious mental illness who are not diverted or removed from segregated confinement shall not be placed on a restricted diet, unless there has been a written determination that the restricted diet is necessary for reasons of safety and security. If a restricted diet is imposed, it shall be limited to seven days, except in the exceptional circumstances where the joint case management committee determines that limiting the restricted diet to seven days would pose an unacceptable risk to the safety and security of inmates or staff. In such case, the need for a restricted diet shall be reassessed by the joint case management committee every seven days.

(v)]All inmates in segregated confinement in a level one or level two facility who are not assessed with a serious mental illness at the initial assessment shall be offered at least one interview with a mental health clinician within [fourteen] seven days of their initial mental health assessment, [and additional interviews at least every thirty days thereafter,] unless the mental health clinician at the most recent interview recommends an earlier interview or assessment. All inmates in [segregated confinement] a residential rehabilitation unit in a level three or level four facility who are not assessed with a serious mental illness at the initial assessment shall be offered at least one interview with a mental health clinician within thirty days of their initial mental health assessment, and additional interviews at least every ninety days thereafter, unless the mental health clinician at the most recent interview recommends an earlier interview or assessment.

§ 5. Subdivision 6 of section 137 of the correction law is amended by adding eight new paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (l), (m) and (n) to read as follows:

(g) Persons in a special population as defined in subdivision thirtytwo of section two of this chapter shall not be placed in segregated confinement for any length of time, except in keeplock for a period prior to a disciplinary hearing pursuant to paragraph (k) of this subdivision. Individuals in a special population who are in keeplock prior to a disciplinary hearing shall be given seven hours a day out-of-cell time or shall be transferred to a residential rehabilitation unit or residential mental health treatment unit as expeditiously as possible, but in no case longer than forty-eight hours from the time an individual is admitted to keeplock.

(h) No person may be placed in segregated confinement for longer than necessary and no more than fifteen consecutive days or twenty total days

S. 1623 5

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the correction law, in relation to restricting the use of segregated confinement and creating alternative therapeutic and reha- bilitative confinement options

Purpose

This bill will be known as the "Humane Alternatives to Long-Term Soli- tary Confinement" Act (the HALT Solitary Confinement Act.) This bill would limit the time an inmate can spend in segregated confinement, end the segregated confinement of vulnerable people, restrict the criteria that can result in such confinement, improve conditions of confinement, and create more humane and effective alternatives to such confinement.

Summary of provisions

Section 1 clarifies that the bill's provisions apply to all types and locations of segregated confinement.

Read the full memo (964 words)

Section 2 defines "special populations" and "residential rehabilitation units".

Section 3 prohibits the use of special diets as punishment.

Section 4 provides for mental health screening and a heightened level of care for prisoners placed into segregated confinement or residential rehabilitation units.

Section 5 prohibits placement of individuals who are in one of the special populations in SHU and limits their keep-lock placement to 48 hours; prohibits placement of any inmate in segregated confinement for more than 15 consecutive days or 20 out of 60 days unless specific acts are committed while in such confinement; specifies certain conditions of confinement and programs within residential rehabilitation units; creates a safety exception for people committing serious disciplinary infractions in SHU and residential rehabilitation units; prohibits the use of restraints in the residential rehabilitation units unless neces- sary for safety and security; prohibits placement of individuals in protective custody in segregated confinement; provides for periodic review of a person's placement in residential rehabilitation units; reinstates lost good time for successful completion of the residential rehabilitation unit program goals; provides for training of staff; and provides for public reporting.

Section 6 creates a preference for non-disciplinary interventions by the department.

Section 7 provides that services in residential mental health treatment units shall be at least comparable to services in residential rehabili- tation units.

Section 8 provides that inmates in residential mentiilh'e4th treatment units may be moved to residential rehabilitation units under certain circumstances.

Section 9 limits the removal of inmates with mental illness from resi- dential mental health units to residential rehabilitation units unless they commit specified acts of misconduct.

Section 10 provides for staff training.

Section 11 provides for Justice Center oversight of segregated confine- ment and residential rehabilitation units.

Section 12 provides for Commission of Correction oversight of segregated confinement in jails.

Section 13 provides for sections of the law to apply to jails. Section 14 is the effective date.

Justification

This bill aims to make New York's prison and jail practices more humane. The bill limits the length of time anyone can spend in segregated confinement, restricts the criteria that can result in such confinement, provides additional procedural protections prior to such confinement, and exempts certain vulnerable groups. The bill also provides an alter- native mechanism for working with people who engage in serious violence or other problematic behavior.

Studies have consistently found that subjecting people to segregated confinement for twenty-two to twenty-four hours a day without meaningful human contact, programming, or therapy can cause deep and permanent psychological, physical, developmental, and social harm. People often have more difficulty complying with prison rules after being placed in segregated confinement. Segregated confinement can be particularly devastating for certain vulnerable people, such as young or elderly people, pregnant women, and people with disabilities or trauma histo- ries. Other states have dramatically reduced the number of people in segregated confinement, and seen positive benefits in terms of safety and decreased violence.

Despite the tremendous harm caused by massive isolation of thousands of incarcerated persons, New York prisons and jails currently impose segre- gated confinement routinely for too long a period of time. On any given day, there are nearly 3,000 people, disproportionately people of color, in state prisons in Special Housing Units (SHU) and thousands more in other forms of isolation. There are also hundreds of people in segre- gated confinement in jails in New York City alone. Despite claims that segregated confinement is used in response to the most violent behavior, five out of six disciplinary infractions that result in SHU time in New York prisons are for non-violent conduct. Moreover, people routinely suffer in segregated confinement for months, years, and even decades in New York.

A growing chorus of individuals, organizations, and policy-makers has called for a dramatic transformation and curtailment of the use of segregated confinement. The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture concluded that solitary confinement can amount to torture and recom- mended abolishing its use beyond 15 days and prohibiting any use of solitary for vulnerable groups or for purposes of punishment. The New York Civil Liberties Union and others have issued reports documenting the arbitrary and unjustified use of segregated confinement in New York and the negative impact its use has on incarcerated persons, staff, and safety in our prisons and communities. The New York State Bar Associ- ation has called upon the state and city corrections departments to profoundly restrict the use of segregated confinement, end segregated confinement beyond 15 days, adopt stringent criteria for any separation and ensure any separation is for the briefest period and in the least restrictive conditions practicable. This bill takes up the growing call to limit segregated confinement and provide more humane and effective alternatives.

Legislative history

2016: S.2659 was referred to crime victims, crime and correction.

2017: S.4784 was referred to crime victims, crime and correction.

2018: S.4748 was amended and recommitted to crime victims, crime and correction.

2018: Assembly passed the bill (A3080-B).

Fiscal implications

To be determined.

Local fiscal implications

To be determined.

Effective date

This act will take effect one year after it becomes law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.