What's happening
This bill establishes strong net neutrality requirements for internet service providers in New York and mandates state contracts comply with these standards.
Why it matters
Protects consumers and small businesses from unfair ISP practices. By prohibiting blocking, throttling, paid prioritization, application-specific pricing, and deceptive marketing, this bill ensures that all users have equal access to online content and services, preventing ISPs from favoring certain sites or charging extra for access to specific applications.
Promotes transparency and informed choice. ISPs would be required to publicly disclose accurate information about network management, service performance, and commercial terms, enabling consumers, businesses, and developers to make informed decisions and to detect violations or unfair practices.
Leverages state purchasing power to enforce compliance. By mandating that all state and municipal contracts for internet services require strict adherence to net neutrality, the bill uses the government’s substantial purchasing leverage to incentivize compliance from ISPs, potentially influencing broader industry standards.
Links net neutrality to public infrastructure and funding. ISPs benefiting from state funding or infrastructure access (such as utility pole attachments or broadband grants) must comply with net neutrality rules, ensuring that public resources are not used to support providers who restrict open internet access, and that state investments benefit the public equitably.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Require Net Neutrality for ISPs
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
History
- Referred to energy and telecommunications
- Referred to energy and telecommunications
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Require Net Neutrality in NY
In Assembly Committee · Corporations, Authorities And Commissions · Sponsor Clyde Vanel
Full text
9 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
2263
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
January 23, 2019
Introduced by Sens. HOYLMAN, BAILEY, BRESLIN, COMRIE, KENNEDY, KRUEGER, MAYER, PERSAUD, SEPULVEDA, SERRANO -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Energy and Telecommunications
AN ACT to amend the public service law, in relation to Internet neutrality; and to amend the state finance law, the general municipal law, the public authorities law and the economic development law, in relation to requiring that procurement contracts require compliance with Internet neutrality requirements
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Legislative intent. The legislature finds and declares the following:
(a) This act is adopted pursuant to the police power inherent in the state of New York to protect and promote the safety, life, public health, public convenience, general prosperity, and well-being of society, and the welfare of the state's population and economy, that are increasingly dependent on an open and neutral Internet.
(b) Almost every sector of New York's economy, democracy, and society is dependent on the open and neutral Internet that supports vital functions regulated under the police power of the state, including, but not limited to, each of the following:
(1) police and emergency services;
(2) health and safety services and infrastructure;
(3) utility services and infrastructure;
(4) transportation infrastructure and services, and the expansion of zero- and low-emission transportation options;
(5) government services, voting, and democratic decision making processes;
(6) education;
(7) business and economic activity;
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD02819-01-9
S. 2263 2
(8) environmental monitoring and protection, and achievement of state environmental goals; and
(9) land use regulation.
§ 2. The public service law is amended by adding a new article 12 to read as follows:
ARTICLE 12
PROVISIONS RELATING TO INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS Section 250. Definitions.
251. Internet neutrality.
252. Broadband Internet access evaluation.
253. Infrastructure awards.
254. Enforcement.
255. Application.
§ 250. Definitions. For purposes of this article, the following definitions apply:
1. "Application-agnostic" means not differentiating on the basis of source, destination, Internet content, application, service, or device, or class of Internet content, application, service, or device.
2. "Application-specific differential pricing" means charging different prices for Internet traffic to customers on the basis of Internet content, application, service, or device, or class of Internet content, application, service, or device, but does not include zero-rating.
3. "Broadband Internet access service" means a mass-market retail service by wire or radio provided to customers in New York that provides the capability to transmit data to, and receive data from, all or substantially all Internet endpoints, including any capabilities that are incidental to and enable the operation of the communications service, but excluding dial-up Internet access service. "Broadband Internet access service" also encompasses any service provided to customers in New York that provides a functional equivalent of that service or that is used to evade the protections set forth in this chapter.
4. "Class of Internet content, application, service, or device" means Internet content, or a group of Internet applications, services, or devices, sharing a common characteristic, including, but not limited to, sharing the same source or destination, belonging to the same type of content, application, service, or device, using the same application- or transport-layer protocol, or having similar technical characteristics, including, but not limited to, the size, sequencing, or timing of packets, or sensitivity to delay.
5. "Content, applications, or services" means all Internet traffic transmitted to or from end users of a broadband Internet access service, including traffic that may not fit clearly into any of these categories.
6. "Edge provider" means any individual or entity that provides any content, application, or service over the Internet, and any individual or entity that provides a device used for accessing any content, application, or service over the Internet.
7. "End user" means any individual or entity that uses a broadband Internet access service.
8. "Internet service provider" or "ISP" means a business that provides broadband Internet access service to an individual, corporation, government, or other customer in New York.
9. "ISP traffic exchange" means the exchange of Internet traffic destined for, or originating from, an Internet service provider's end users between the Internet service provider's network and another indi-
S. 2263 3
vidual or entity, including, but not limited to, an edge provider, content delivery network, or other network operator.
10. "Mass market" means a service marketed and sold on a standardized basis to residential customers, small businesses, and other end-use customers, including, but not limited to, schools, institutions of higher learning, and libraries. The term also includes broadband Internet access services purchased with support of the E-rate and Rural Health program and similar programs at the federal and state level, regardless of whether they are customized or individually negotiated, as well as any broadband Internet access service offered using networks supported by the Connect America Fund or similar programs at the federal and state level.
11. "Network management practice" means a practice that has a primarily technical network management justification, but does not include other business practices.
12. "Reasonable network management practice" means a network management practice that is primarily used for, and tailored to, achieving a legitimate network management purpose, taking into account the particular network architecture and technology of the broadband Internet access service, and that is as application-agnostic as possible.
13. "Third-party paid prioritization" means the management of an Internet service provider's network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through the use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either: (a) in exchange for consideration, monetary or otherwise, from a third party; or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity.
14. "Zero-rating" means exempting some Internet traffic from a customer's data limitation.
§ 251. Internet neutrality. 1. It shall be unlawful for an Internet service provider, insofar as the provider is engaged in providing broadband Internet access service, to engage in any of the following activities:
(a) Blocking lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management practices.
(b) Speeding up, slowing down, altering, restricting, interfering with, or otherwise directly or indirectly favoring, disadvantaging, or discriminating between lawful Internet traffic on the basis of source, destination, Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, or of class of Internet content, application, service, or non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management practices.
(c) Requiring consideration from edge providers, monetary or otherwise, in exchange for access to the Internet service provider's end users, including, but not limited to, requiring consideration for either of the following:
(i) transmitting Internet traffic to and from the Internet service provider's end users.
(ii) refraining from the activities prohibited in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subdivision.
(d) Engaging in third-party paid prioritization.
(e) Engaging in application-specific differential pricing or zero-rating in exchange for consideration, monetary or otherwise, by third parties.
S. 2263 4
(f) Zero-rating some Internet content, applications, services, or devices in a category of Internet content, applications, services, or devices, but not the entire category.
(g) Engaging in application-specific differential pricing.
(h) Unreasonably interfering with, or unreasonably disadvantaging, either an end user's ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of the end user's choice, or an edge provider's ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to an end user, subject to reasonable network management practices.
(i) Engaging in practices with respect to, related to, or in connection with, ISP traffic exchange that have the purpose or effect of circumventing or undermining the effectiveness of this section.
(j) Engaging in deceptive or misleading marketing practices that misrepresent the treatment of Internet traffic, content, applications, services, or devices by the Internet service provider, or that misrepresent the performance characteristics or commercial terms of the broadband Internet access service to its customers.
(k) Advertising, offering for sale, or selling broadband Internet access service without prominently disclosing with specificity all aspects of the service advertised, offered for sale, or sold.
(l) Failing to publicly disclose accurate information regarding the network management practices, performance, and commercial terms of its broadband Internet access services sufficient for consumers to make informed choices regarding use of those services and for content, application, service, and device providers to develop, market, and maintain Internet offerings.
(m) Offering or providing services other than broadband Internet access service that are delivered over the same last-mile connection as the broadband Internet access service, if those services satisfy any of the following conditions:
(i) they are marketed, provide, or can be used as a functional equivalent of broadband Internet access service.
(ii) they have the purpose or effect of circumventing or undermining the effectiveness of this section.
(iii) they negatively affect the performance of broadband Internet access service.
2. (a) An Internet service provider may offer different types of technical treatment to end users as part of its broadband Internet access service, without violating the provisions of subdivision one of this section, if all of the following conditions exist:
(i) The different types of technical treatment are equally available to all Internet content, applications, services, and devices, and all classes of Internet content, applications, services, and devices, and the Internet service provider does not discriminate in the provision of the different types of technical treatment on the basis of Internet content, application, service, or device, or class of Internet content, application, service, or device.
(ii) The Internet service provider's end users are able to choose whether, when, and for which Internet content, applications, services, or devices, or classes of Internet content, applications, services, or devices, to use each type of technical treatment.
(iii) The Internet service provider charges only its own broadband Internet access service customers for the use of the different types of technical treatment.
S. 2263 5
(b) Any Internet service provider offering different types of technical treatment pursuant to this subdivision shall notify the commission and provide the commission with a specimen of any service contract that it offers to customers in New York.
(c) If an Internet service provider offers different types of technical treatment pursuant to this subdivision, the commission shall monitor the quality of the basic default service and establish minimum quality requirements if the offering of the different types of technical treatment degrades the quality of the basic default service.
3. An Internet service provider may zero-rate Internet traffic in application-agnostic ways, without violating the provisions of subdivision one of this section, provided that no consideration, monetary or otherwise, is provided by any third party in exchange for the provider's decision to zero-rate or to not zero-rate traffic.
§ 252. Broadband Internet access evaluation. The commission, in consultation with the power authority of the state of New York, the NYS Broadband Program Office and electrical corporations, shall evaluate the role broadband Internet access and tools, especially as they relate to private consumers, will play in the future operation of the state's power grid. The evaluation should consider at least the following:
1. the reliance of electrical corporations on consumer broadband services to manage energy resources;
2. the impact that paid prioritization, throttling, and blocking in consumer broadband Internet service would have on resource management and grid reliability; and
3. the future cost to the state and agencies if state agencies need to enter into long-term paid prioritization contracts if net neutrality principles are no longer in place.
§ 253. Infrastructure awards. 1. An award of moneys by the NYS Broadband Program Office for the building of infrastructure for broadband communications shall require the awardee to prevent any Internet service provider that provides broadband Internet access service utilizing that infrastructure from violating the provisions of section two hundred fifty-one of this article.
2. An award of moneys by the NYS Broadband Program Office for access to the Internet shall prohibit any Internet service provider that receives those moneys from violating the provisions of section two hundred fifty-one of this article.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the public service law, in relation to Internet neutral- ity; and to amend the state finance law, the general municipal law, the public authorities law and the economic development law, in relation to requiring that procurement contracts require compliance with Internet neutrality requirements
Purpose
The purpose of this bill is to establish a comprehensive framework to restore net neutrality and thus preserve a free and open internet.
Summary of provisions
Section 1 establishes legislative intent. It finds and declares this act is adopted pursuant to the police power of the state.
Read the full memo (1,077 words)
Section 2 amends the public service law by adding a new article 12 that defines provisions relating to internet service providers including: internet neutrality, Broadband Internet Access Evaluation, and Infras- tructure awards. In addition to the authority granted to the commission, this grants the attorney general the ability to enforce provisions of this article under section sixty-three of executive law. This section establishes that nothing in this article supersedes or limits any obli- gation of an ISP to address the needs of emergency communications or law enforcement, public safety or national security authorities.
Section 3 amends Section 219 of public service law to add a new subdivi- sion 4 that establishes that certain definitions shall have the same meaning in this section as in section two hundred and fifty of this chapter. This section also prohibits certain activities by a cable oper- ator or video service provider, insofar as the provider has been granted a franchise, and any affiliate, insofar as the provider is engaged in providing broadband Internet access service.
Section 4 amends Section 119-a of the public service law by providing that no permission shall be granted to a cable television or Internet service provider for attachments on utility poles as provided in the section unless such Internet service provider is in compliance with the provisions of section two hundred fifty-one of this chapter.
Section 5 amends Section 165 of the state finance law by adding a new subdivision 9 that provides the state shall not purchase, provide fund- ing or enter into a contract with a provider of broadband internet access unless the service is consistent with the requirements of section two hundred-fifty-one of the public service law. If, after a contract is entered, the Internet service provider is deemed to have violated the sections the contract will be void and require repayments. There is an exemption for geographical areas with limited Internet access services. An Internet service provider shall publicly disclose accurate informa- tion sufficient to enable end users and purchasers to fully ascertain the service is conducted in a lawful manner.
Section 6 amends the general municipal law that provides a municipal corporation shall not purchase, provide funding or enter into a contract with a provider of broadband Internet access unless the service is consistent with the requirements of section two hundred-fifty-one of the public service law. If, after a contract is entered, the Internet service provider is deemed to have violated the terms of this legis- lation, the contract will be void and require repayments. There is an exemption for geographical areas with limited Internet access services. An Internet service provider shall publicly disclose accurate informa- tion sufficient to enable end users and purchasers to fully ascertain that the service is conducted in a lawful manner.
Section 7 amends section 2879 of the public authorities law by adding a new paragraph (n-1 that requires procurements comply with section two hundred fifty-one of the public service law.
Section 8 amends section 143 of the economic development law to require each agency to conduct procurements in a manner that complies with the provisions of section two hundred fifty one of the public service law.
Section 9 establishes severability.
Section 10 establishes the effective date.
Justification
On December 14, 2017 the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to repeal the open internet and "network neutrality" rules formal- ly established in 2015, but with roots stemming back to 2005. The underlying purpose of net neutrality is that all content on the internet should be treated equally. Without it, broadband providers which control access to the Internet can block or throttle certain services or appli- cations for their own profit, and distort what content a consumer can freely access. The Internet is now at risk of falling victim to the whims of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) managing and manipulating content and content speeds.
Where the Federal government fails it is necessary for the states to step in and provide a platform for innovation and free expression, while protecting consumers and spurring the economy. Net neutrality has become enshrined in as a core principle to free speech and to the health of democracy. In a world in which the Internet is considered to be the "great equalizer," an open Internet allows for the creation of a plat- form for expanded discourse, greater access to information and the abil- ity of the disenfranchised to organize. Infringing on net neutrality is antithetical to democracy itself, as it gives control over content to large special interests rather than to the people. Further, net neutrality allows for innovation, the proliferation of small businesses and private-sector job creation. Thus, this is an issue that goes to our core values as Americans-that of free speech and the American economic dream. It is now incumbent on states, like New York, to restore an open and free internet.
This bill is modeled after California's net neutrality bill Senate Bill 822 of 2018, which has been heralded as the strongest and most compre- hensive net neutrality legislation in the nation. The bill will effec- tively codify all of the protections established by the 2015 FCC Order. By doing so this fully restores the protections all Americans have come to rely upon and ensures that they will have them into the future.
If both New York and California re-establish net neutrality, it would send a strong signal that the nation's largest states and economies intend to ensure that their residents are protected. The internet is no longer a luxury, but a necessity in every area of American life ranging from education to public safety. The states must act to protect its free and open access.
Legislative history
2018: S.8321 (Hoylman) - Died in Energy and Telcommunications
Effective date
This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.