What's happening
This bill prohibits cities from issuing late fees for parking violations until after a finding of liability is made.
Why it matters
Shifts burden of late fees. Cities can no longer impose late fees or additional penalties simply for not responding to a parking ticket; these fees can only apply if you’ve been found liable and then fail to pay, making the process more fair to alleged violators.
Reduces risk of automatic penalties. People who miss responding to a notice (for reasons like lost mail or administrative errors) won’t automatically face extra financial penalties—only those who have officially been found guilty and then don’t pay.
Limits city revenue from non-liable individuals. This change could reduce city revenues generated from people who were never actually found liable for a violation, potentially encouraging municipalities to improve their systems for proper notice and adjudication.
Strengthens due process protections. By requiring a finding of liability before late fees are assessed, the bill reinforces the principle that penalties shouldn’t be imposed without a fair hearing or official determination, reducing the risk of unfair financial burdens on residents.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
No Late Fees Before Liability
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
No co-sponsors yet.
History
- Referred to transportation
- Referred to transportation
Full text
3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
3047
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
February 1, 2019
Introduced by Sen. SANDERS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Transportation
AN ACT to amend the vehicle and traffic law, in relation to prohibiting the issuance of late fees prior to a finding of liability for a parking violation; and repealing certain provisions of such law relating thereto
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Paragraph a of subdivision 2 of section 235 of the vehicle and traffic law, as amended by section 18 of part J of chapter 62 of the laws of 2003, is amended to read as follows:
a. Notice. (1) Whenever a city issues a notice of violation for a parking violation, it shall be served in the manner prescribed by subdivision two of section two hundred thirty-eight of this article.
(2) Whenever a person has been issued a notice of violation for a parking violation and has not responded in the manner described in the notice, a city shall give the owner a second notice of the violation by regular first class mail: (i) within forty days of issuance of the first notice of violation for a parking violation where the vehicle is a vehicle registered in this state; or (ii) within forty days of the receipt by such city of the name and address of the owner of the vehicle where the vehicle is a vehicle registered in any other state. Such second notice shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:
(A) that the owner has a period of twenty days from issuance of the second notice in which to respond to the notice of violation for a parking violation;
(B) that failure to respond to the notice of violation for a parking violation may result in the suspension and non-renewal of the owner's registration;
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD09143-01-9
S. 3047 2
(C) [that failure to respond to the notice of violation for a parking violation may subject the owner to additional penalties as provided in paragraph b of this subdivision;
(D)] that failure to respond to the notice of violation for a parking violation shall subject the owner to a default judgment as provided in paragraph [c] b of this subdivision [and the additional penalties imposed upon parking violations pursuant to paragraph b of this subdivision]; and
[(E)] (D) that submission of a plea of guilty to the parking violation makes the owner liable for payment of the stated fine [and additional penalties imposed pursuant to paragraph b of this subdivision] and the mandatory surcharge of fifteen dollars imposed upon parking violations pursuant to section eighteen hundred nine-a of this chapter.
(1) Upon written application of the chief executive officer of any such city, the commissioner may authorize for a specified time period the use of a notice mailer form that does not contain all the information set forth in this subdivision but which was used by such city on or before the effective date of this section.
(2) In addition, the commissioner may suspend for a period not to exceed one year from the effective date of this section the provisions of this subdivision requiring that a second notice of violation be served within forty days of issuance of the first notice of a parking violation, upon written application of the chief executive officer of any such city demonstrating that immediate imposition of such notice requirement will cause substantial financial hardship to such city, and setting forth the steps to be taken by such city to achieve compliance with the notice requirements of this subdivision at the end of such one hundred eighty day period. Upon granting such application, the commissioner shall specify a period, not to exceed seventy-five days, within which such second notice must be served[, and shall adjust accordingly the time periods set forth in paragraph b of this subdivision to provide that the additional penalties set forth in such subdivision will not be imposed prior to the stated number of days from the service of such notice].
§ 2. Paragraphs b, b-1, b-2 and b-3 of subdivision 2 of section 235 of the vehicle and traffic law are REPEALED and paragraph c of subdivision 2 is relettered paragraph b.
§ 3. Subparagraph (iii) of paragraph (c) of subdivision 2-a of section 238 of the vehicle and traffic law, as added by chapter 409 of the laws of 2001, is amended to read as follows:
(iii) Upon a finding by a hearing examiner that the dismissal of a charged parking violation has been procured due to the knowing fraud, false testimony, misrepresentation, or other misconduct, or the knowing alteration of a notice of parking violation, by the person so charged or his or her agent, employee, or representative, the dismissal shall be set aside and a determination may be rendered against the owner on the charged parking violation. The hearing examiner may impose monetary penalties for the charged parking violation of up to three times the scheduled fine for the violation [and three times the additional penalties that may be imposed for failure to respond to a notice of violation pursuant to section two hundred thirty-five of this article. For purposes of determining the amount of such additional penalties, the hearing examiner shall disregard the plea that procured the dismissal that has been set aside and shall calculate such penalties as if there had been no plea or appearance in the proceeding]. In any proceeding under this paragraph to set aside a determination and to impose penal-
S. 3047 3
ties for the violation, it shall not be necessary for the hearing examiner to find that the owner personally committed the unlawful acts that procured the dismissal of the violation.
§ 4. The vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding a new section 238-a to read as follows:
§ 238-a. Prohibition of certain late fees. Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of this article, or any general, special, or local law or administrative code to the contrary, an owner shall not be subject to additional penalties for failure to respond to a notice of violation but only, in the event such owner is found liable for such violation, failure to pay the imposed fine in a timely fashion.
§ 5. This act shall take effect immediately, provided, however that the amendments to subdivision 2 of section 235 of the vehicle and traffic law made by sections one and two of this act, shall not affect the expiration of such subdivision and shall be deemed to expire therewith.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the vehicle and traffic law, in relation to prohibiting the issuance of late fees prior to a finding of liability for a parking violation; and repealing certain provisions of such law relating thereto
Purpose
To repeal additional penalties for failure to respond to a notice of a parking violation when there is no finding of liability for the violation.
Summary of provisions
Section 1 amends paragraph a of subdivision 2 of section 235 of the vehicle and traffic law, as amended by section 18 of part J of chapter 62 of the laws of 2003, to remove a city's requirements to notify a person who has not responded to a parking violation that failure to respond may subject the owner to additional penalties.
Section 2 repeals paragraphs b, b-1, b-2 and b-3 of subdivision 2 of section 235 of the vehicle and traffic law (additional penalties) and paragraph c of subdivision 2 is relettered paragraph b.
Section 3 amends subparagraph (iii) of paragraph (c) of subdivision 2-a of section 238 of the vehicle and traffic law, as amended by chapter 409 of the laws of 2001, removing the potential fine of three times the additional penalties that may be imposed for failure to respond to a notice of violation.
Section 4 amends the vehicle and traffic law by adding a new section 238-a prohibiting certain late fees for parking violations. Notwith- standing any rule to the contrary, an owner shall not be subject to additional penalties for failure to respond to a notice of violation, except failure to pay the fine in a timely fashion, but only if the owner is found liable for the parking violation.
Section 5 provides the effective date.
Existing law
Additional fees may be imposed for failure to respond to a notice of a parking violation, even when the owner of the car is found not liable for the parking violation.
Justification
This will provide relief to New Yorkers burdened with having to pay additional penalties for parking tickets they should not have been writ- ten.
Legislative history
04/27/16 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION
Fiscal implications
Undetermined
Local fiscal implications
None
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately, provided, however, that the amendments to subdivision 2 of section 235 of the vehicle and traffic law made by sections one and two of this act, shall not affect the expi- ration of such subdivision and shall be deemed to expire therewith.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.