Skip to content
S3351Senate2019-2020 Session

Protect Jury Duty Workers

Official title

“Creates additional remedies for unlawful discharge, penalty, or discrimination due to the exercise of an employee's right to be absent from employment for jury duty”

Sponsor Brad Hoylman-SigalSD-27Affects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Judiciary
Impact
6/10
Moderate
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

This bill expands protections and remedies for employees who face discharge, penalty, or discrimination for attending jury duty.

Why it matters

  1. Expands legal remedies for employees. The bill makes it explicit that if an employer penalizes, discriminates against, or discharges an employee for attending jury duty, the employee can pursue both civil penalties and a private lawsuit, potentially leading to reinstatement, lost pay, liquidated damages (up to $20,000), and attorney’s fees.

  2. Strengthens enforcement mechanisms. Each violation is treated as a separate offense, increasing potential liability for employers who repeatedly violate protections. The Department of Labor must consider prior offenses when determining penalties, raising the stakes for repeat violators.

  3. Clarifies and broadens the definition of discrimination. The language is updated to explicitly include any form of discrimination, not just discharge or penalty, offering broader protection for employees who serve on juries and making it harder for employers to find loopholes.

  4. Removes time limits for bringing complaints in some cases. The bill specifies that certain statute of limitations provisions do not apply to these violations, and time is tolled if an investigation is underway, making it easier for employees to seek justice even if the process takes time.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Protect Jury Duty Workers

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Brad Hoylman-Sigal

Senator · Senate District 27

Chair, Judiciary

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to judiciary
  2. Referred to judiciary

Full text

3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

3351

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

February 5, 2019

Introduced by Sen. HOYLMAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary

AN ACT to amend the judiciary law and the labor law, in relation to creating additional remedies for unlawful discharge, penalty or discrimination on account of the exercise of a juror's right to be absent from employment for jury duty

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Section 519 of the judiciary law, as added by chapter 85 of the laws of 1995, is amended to read as follows:

§ 519. Right of juror to be absent from employment. Any person who is summoned to serve as a juror under the provisions of this article and who notifies his or her employer to that effect prior to the commencement of a term of service shall not, on account of absence from employment by reason of such jury service, be subject to discharge [or], penalty, or discrimination in any other manner. An employer may, however, withhold wages of any such employee serving as a juror during the period of such service; provided that an employer who employs more than ten employees shall not withhold the first forty dollars of such juror's daily wages during the first three days of jury service. Withholding of wages in accordance with this section shall not be deemed a penalty or discrimination in any other manner. Violation of this section shall constitute a criminal contempt of court punishable pursuant to section seven hundred fifty of this chapter and shall also constitute a violation of section two hundred fifteen of the labor law and be subject to the civil penalties and civil action provided for thereunder.

§ 2. Paragraph 7 of subdivision A of section 750 of the judiciary law, as amended by chapter 823 of the laws of 1982, is amended to read as follows:

7. Wilful failure to obey any mandate, process, or notice issued pursuant to [articles] article sixteen[, seventeen, eighteen, eighteen-a

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD00755-01-9

S. 3351 2

or eighteen-b] of [the judiciary law] this chapter, or to rules adopted pursuant thereto, or to any other statute relating thereto, or refusal to be sworn as provided therein, or subjection of an employee to discharge [or], penalty, or discrimination in any other manner on account of his or her absence from employment by reason of jury or subpoenaed witness service in violation of this chapter or section 215.11 of the penal law. Applications to punish the accused for a contempt specified in this subdivision may be made by notice of motion or by order to show cause, and shall be made returnable at the term of the supreme court at which contested motions are heard, or of the county court if the supreme court is not in session.

§ 3. Section 215 of the labor law, as amended by chapter 564 of the laws of 2010, paragraph (b) of subdivision 1 and paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 as amended by chapter 537 of the laws of 2014, is amended to read as follows:

§ 215. [Penalties] Civil penalties and civil action; prohibited retaliation. 1. (a) No employer or his or her agent, or the officer or agent of any corporation, partnership, or limited liability company, or any other person, shall discharge, threaten, penalize, or in any other manner discriminate or retaliate against any employee (i) because such employee has made a complaint to his or her employer, or to the commissioner or his or her authorized representative, or to the attorney general or any other person, that the employer has engaged in conduct that the employee, reasonably and in good faith, believes violates any provision of this chapter, or any order issued by the commissioner (ii) because such employer or person believes that such employee has made a complaint to his or her employer, or to the commissioner or his or her authorized representative, or to the attorney general, or to any other person that the employer has violated any provision of this chapter, or any order issued by the commissioner (iii) because such employee has caused to be instituted or is about to institute a proceeding under or related to this chapter, or (iv) because such employee has provided information to the commissioner or his or her authorized representative or the attorney general, or (v) because such employee has testified or is about to testify in an investigation or proceeding under this chapter, or (vi) because such employee has otherwise exercised rights protected under this chapter, or (vii) because the employer has received an adverse determination from the commissioner involving the employee, or (viii) because such employee has exercised his or her right to be absent from employment pursuant to section five hundred nineteen of the judiciary law by reason of jury service.

An employee complaint or other communication need not make explicit reference to any section or provision of this chapter to trigger the protections of this section.

(b) If after investigation the commissioner finds that an employer or person has violated any provision of this section, the commissioner may, by an order which shall describe particularly the nature of the violation, assess the employer or person a civil penalty of not less than one thousand nor more than ten thousand dollars provided, however, that if the commissioner finds that the employer has violated the provisions of this section in the preceding six years, he or she may assess a civil penalty of not less than one thousand nor more than twenty thousand dollars. Each act taken in contravention of a prohibition contained in this section shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this section, and in assessing any such civil penalty the commissioner shall consider, in addition to the nature of the violation,

S. 3351 3

all prior findings of violations of the provisions of this section by the employer. The commissioner may also order all appropriate relief including enjoining the conduct of any person or employer; ordering payment of liquidated damages to the employee by the person or entity in violation; and, where the person or entity in violation is an employer ordering rehiring or reinstatement of the employee to his or her former position or an equivalent position, and an award of lost compensation or an award of front pay in lieu of reinstatement and an award of lost compensation. Liquidated damages shall be calculated as an amount not more than twenty thousand dollars. The commissioner may assess liquidated damages on behalf of every employee aggrieved under this section, in addition to any other remedies permitted by this section.

(c) The provisions of section two hundred thirteen of this article shall not apply to the violations specified in this section.

(d) This section shall not apply to employees of the state or any municipal subdivisions or departments thereof.

2. (a) [An] In addition to the civil penalties provided for under subdivision one of this section, an employee may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against any employer or persons alleged to have violated the provisions of this section. The court shall have jurisdiction to restrain violations of this section, within two years after such violation, regardless of the dates of employment of the employee, and to order all appropriate relief, including enjoining the conduct of any person or employer; ordering payment of liquidated damages, costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the employee by the person or entity in violation; and, where the person or entity in violation is an employer, ordering rehiring or reinstatement of the employee to his or her former position with restoration of seniority or an award of front pay in lieu of reinstatement, and an award of lost compensation and damages, costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. Liquidated damages shall be calculated as an amount not more than twenty thousand dollars. The court shall award liquidated damages to every employee aggrieved under this section, in addition to any other remedies permitted by this section. The statute of limitations shall be tolled from the date an employee files a complaint with the commissioner or the commissioner commences an investigation, whichever is earlier, until an order to comply issued by the commissioner becomes final, or where the commissioner does not issue an order, until the date on which the commissioner notifies the complainant that the investigation has concluded. Investigation by the commissioner shall not be a prerequisite to nor a bar against a person bringing a civil action under this section.

(b) At or before the commencement of any action under this section, notice thereof shall be served upon the attorney general by the employee.

3. Any employer or his or her agent, or the officer or agent of any corporation, partnership, or limited liability company, or any other person who violates subdivision one of this section shall be guilty of a class B misdemeanor.

§ 4. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have become a law.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the judiciary law and the labor law, in relation to creating additional remedies for unlawful discharge, penalty or discrim- ination on account of the exercise of a juror's right to be absent from employment for jury duty

Purpose or general idea of bill

Adds discrimination in any manner in addition to discharge or penalty as actions an employer cannot engage in when an employee is selected for jury duty. This act also amends the labor law so that civil penalties can be levied against the employer and/or civil action can be brought against the employer for violations arising from an employee's right to be absent from employment due to jury duty.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 1 amends section 519 of the judiciary law to specify that absence due to jury duty service is not grounds for discharge or any discrimination of any kind from one's employer.

Section 2 Amends paragraph 7 of subdivision A of section 750 of the judiciary law, as amended by chapter 823 of the laws of 1982.

Section 3 amends section 215 of the labor law, as amended by chapter 564 of the laws of 2010, and paragraph (b) of subdivision 1 and paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of the laws of 2014, to allow the Commissioner of the Department of Labor to assess civil penalties against employers if it is determined that they in any way discriminated against workers resulting for jury duty service.

Section 3 also permits employees to wage additional civil action against employers for any discrimination, loss of employment, damages, and reasonable attorney's fees.

Section 4 provides for an effective date.

Justification

This act is needed to prevent any discrimination that might occur by an employer against an employee because the employee chose to exercise their duty and privilege of serving on a jury. In the past, an employer could not penalize or discharge an employee who served on a jury. This act would further clarify the law, allowing more employees to feel more secure in fulfilling their obligation, thereby allowing more persons to participate in the jury process. In turn, this would give our juries a greater cross-section of the population and make juries more represen- tative of society. This act would also allow for civil penalties and civil action against employers which will help to ensure that employers do not penalize, discharge or discriminate against those employees who are called to serve on juries.

Prior legislative history

New Bill.

Fiscal implications

None to the State.

Effective date

This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.